
There exists a very interesting holiday here in England on the 5th of November called
Guy Fawkes Night that commemorates the Gunpowder Plot of 1605.
If you want more information you can read
this, but here's a short summary. King James I was the Protestant King of England, and Catholics felt that they were being treated unfairly. A group of extremists planned to rectify the situation by exploding 2.5 tons of gunpowder underneath the House of Lords during the State Opening of Parliament, killing everyone in the immediate vicinity. This was intended to ignite (no pun intended) a revolt in the Midlands.
No one knows exactly how the Protestants discovered the plot, but they arrested Guy Fawkes, who was acting as the suicide bomber, in the early morning of the fateful day. After lengthy torture he revealed the names of his co-conspirators, all of whom were hanged, drawn and quartered; a process which is so gruesome I'm not going to describe it here.
There's a strong push here to undergo willful amnesia about the origin of this "celebration," to rename it as "Fireworks Night" and reduce it to an excuse to satiate our collective pyromania. But I want to go the other direction: not to reduce it, but to enlarge it, and to reflect on it as an example of a more general phenomenon.
"By this sign, conquer." And ever since, people have been using the power of the cross to establish the power of Rome. Not that the problem is unique to Christianity of course. Islam has proven a fertile ground, and Judaism has been on both sides of the phenomenon more times than anyone can count. Hopefully the critique of my own tradition is enough to acquit me of insensitivity towards any other in this area.
Secularists have picked up on this phenomenon, of course, and they like to call it The Problem of Religion. The Problem, they say, is that when people become really convinced of spiritual principles, they can be motivated to commit acts that the rest of the non-fanatical world can easily recognize as immoral and unjust. The Solution, then, is straightforward: if you have religious beliefs, keep them to yourself. You can think whatever you want, as long as you promise not to let your thoughts influence your actions. The intended result of this Solution is that society will be guided by Reason instead of Religion, or more precisely, Human Thought instead of Divine Revelation. Surely, they say, it is religion which convinces people to commit these acts, and if they were left to their own devices, they would recognize how wrong they were! Interestingly enough, this attitude is also adopted by Christians in light of modern terrorism. Surely, they say, Islam is the problem.
Are they right? Is religion the culprit that turns ordinary people into perpetrators of heinous acts? I'm not so sure.
First, Secularism itself is not exempt from the Problem. If the French Revolution teaches us anything, it's that Reason produces its own fanaticism. Consider also the Nazi Regime. It would appear that a Darwinian philosophy is as dangerous as any religion.
It seems then that religion is not the source of the problem.
This is a very freeing realization: Muslims do not have to be condemned for belonging to a "violent religion," because adherents of all religions are violent. Christians do not have to be ashamed of their faith in secular societies, because Secularism is no more likely to lead to a less fanatical society. And atheists and agnostics can stop being afraid of their religious neighbors, because
it is not religion that makes people violent.It is also an extremely disconcerting realization: If not religion, then what? Religion, like any institution, is easy to blame, because it is easy to label. It seems that any system of thought or philosophy one could choose to subscribe to has been used to justify evil. Is there any escape? Wherever we go, we will find ourselves sharing our bed with a villain.
If we can't find the solution in external factors, we must conclude that evil comes from within.
There is substantial evidence to support this claim. In the right context, most "normal" people will participate in persecution and genocide - without religion, without any philosophical manifesto. Nothing but the right opportunity.
What lessons can we take from this example of 400-year old "Christian" terrorism? Only that evil doesn't operate according to our labels and generalizations. Evil does not reside in the Middle East, and so it can't be conquered by Western democracy. It doesn't reside in Hollywood, and so it can't be conquered by the Bible Belt. It doesn't reside in Religion, and so it can't be overcome by Secularism. It resides in the individual, and therefore it can only be conquered by the individual. Let's stop rooting out extremism in other people, and start rooting it out of ourselves.
Comments? Extensions? Contradictions? Post it as a comment...